Health Equity/Social Determinants of Health Archives - Page 22 of 26

Women-Inspired Neighborhood Network (WIN Network): Detroit

In 2008, the CEOs of Detroit Medical Center, Henry Ford Health System, Oakwood Healthcare System, and St. John Providence Health System commissioned the Detroit Regional Infant Mortality Reduction Task Force to develop a plan of action to help more babies reach their first birthdays. The Task Force addresses Detroit’s infant mortality rate, which is nearly 15/1000 live births, among the highest in the nation. Working through a public-private partnership of Detroit’s major health systems, public health, academic, and community partners, the Task Force seeks to tighten the disconnected medical and social services for women. The Task Force and its WIN Network have realized a number of accomplishments as of August 2014 including zero infant deaths among more than 200 babies born to date and the enrollment of 364 pregnant women in the program. Funding for this project comes from a variety of foundations, organizations, and institutions. To read more about this innovative program, see this brief summary [link].

Nearly Half of States Score 5 or Lower out of 10 on Substance Misuse Prevention Report Card

Youth Drug Overdose Death Rates more than Doubled in 35 States in Just Over a Decade

Washington, D.C., November 19, 2015– According to a new Trust for America’s Health (TFAH) report, Reducing Teen Substance Misuse: What Really Works, 24 states scored five or lower out of 10 on key indicators of leading evidence-based policies and programs that can improve the well-being of children and youth and have been connected with preventing and reducing substance – alcohol, tobacco or other drugs – misuse.

Four states tied for the lowest score of three out of a possible 10 – Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi and Wyoming – while two states achieved 10 out of 10 – Minnesota and New Jersey. The indicators were developed in consultation with top substance misuse prevention experts.

The Reducing Teen Substance Misuse report includes an analysis of the most recent drug overdose death rates among 12- to 25-year-olds, finding that:

Current rates were highest in West Virginia (12.6 per 100,000 youth) — which were more than five times higher than the lowest rates in North Dakota (2.2 per 100,000).
Males are 2.5 times as likely to overdose as females (10.4 vs. 4.1 per 100,000).
In 1999-2001, no state had a youth drug overdose death rate above 6.1 per 100,000. By 2011-13, 33 states were above 6.1 per 100,000. In the past 12 years:
- Rates have more than doubled in 18 states (Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina and Tennessee);
- Rates have more than tripled in twelve states (Arkansas, Delaware, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New York, Oklahoma, Utah and West Virginia); and
- Rates have more than quadrupled in five states (Kansas, Montana, Ohio, Wisconsin and Wyoming).

“More than 90 percent of adults who develop a substance use disorder began using before they were 18,” said Jeffrey Levi, PhD, executive director of TFAH. “Achieving any major reduction in substance misuse will require a reboot in our approach – starting with a greater emphasis on preventing use before it starts, intervening and providing support earlier and viewing treatment and recovery as a long-term commitment.”

The increase in youth drug overdose deaths is largely tied to increases in prescription drug misuse and the related doubling in heroin use by 18- to 25-year-olds in the past 10 years – 45 percent of people who use heroin are also addicted to prescription painkillers.

In addition, youth marijuana rates have increased by nearly 6 percent since 2008 and more than 13 percent of high school students report using e-cigarettes. Youth from affluent families and/or neighborhoods report more frequent substance and alcohol use than lower-income teens – often related to having more resources to access alcohol and drugs.

The report highlights 10 indicators of the types of policy strategies that can help curb substance misuse by tweens, teens and young adults:

Limiting Access:
- 37 states and Washington, D.C. have liability “dram shop” laws holding establishments accountable for selling alcohol to underage or obviously intoxicated individuals.
- 30 states and Washington, D.C. have smoke-free laws prohibiting smoking in public places, including restaurants and bars.

Supporting Improved Well-being of Tweens, Teens and Young Adults:
- 30 states had rates of treatment for teens with major depressive episodes above 38.1 percent.
- 29 states and Washington, D.C. increased funding for mental health services in Fiscal Year 2015.
- 21 states have comprehensive bullying prevention laws.
- 35 states have at least an 80 percent high school graduation rate.
- 31 states and Washington, D.C. have taken action to roll back “one-size-fits-all” sentences for nonviolent drug and other offenses.

Improving Counseling, Early Intervention and Treatment and Recovery Support:
- 32 states and Washington, D.C. have explicit billing codes for Screening (questionnaires/conversations), Brief Intervention (short counseling) and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in their medical health (Medicaid or private insurance) programs, yet currently fewer than half of pediatricians report talking to teen patients about alcohol and other drug use.
- 31 states and Washington, D.C. have laws in place to provide a degree of immunity from criminal charges or mitigation of sentencing for an individual seeking help for themselves or others experiencing an overdose.
- 30 states and Washington, D.C. provide Medicaid coverage for all three medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of painkiller addiction.

“The case for a prevention-first and continuum-of-care approach is supported by more than 40 years of research, but the science hasn’t been implemented on a wide scale in the real world,” said Alexa Eggleston, senior program officer, domestic programs, Conrad N. Hilton Foundation. “It’s time to bring innovations to scale and invest in more proactive and sustained approaches that promote positive protective factors, like safe, stable families, homes, schools and communities and intervene early to address youth substance use before addiction develops.”

Reducing Teen Substance Misuse identified a set of research-based approaches and recommendations to modernize the nation’s strategy to prevent and reduce substance use and support a full continuum-of-care, including:

Putting prevention first, using evidence-based approaches across communities and in schools. Each state should have an end-to-end network of experts and resources to support the effective community-based selection, adoption, implementation and evaluation of evidence-based programs;
Strategically investing in evidence-based programs that show the strongest results in reducing risk factors for substance misuse, poor academic performance, bullying, depression, violence, suicide, unsafe sexual behaviors and other problems that often emerge during teen years and young adulthood;
Integrating school-based and wider community efforts, via multisector collaboration – and effectively collecting data to assess community needs, better select programs that match with those needs and improve accountability. Schools cannot and should not be expected to solve the problem on their own;
Renewing efforts to gain support for the adoption and implementation of evidence-based and sustained school-based programs – moving beyond decades of ineffective approaches;
Incorporating SBIRT as a routine practice in middle and high schools and healthcare settings – along with other regular health screenings – even brief counseling and interventions can have a positive impact; and
Increasing funding support for sustained and ongoing mental health and substance use treatment and recovery.

The report provides additional research-based recommendations for preventing and reducing youth substance misuse. It was supported by a grant from the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation.

Score Summary:

A full list of all of the indicators and scores, listed below. For the state-by-state scoring, states received one point for achieving an indicator or zero points if they did not achieve the indicator. Zero is the lowest possible overall score, 10 is the highest.

10 out of 10: Minnesota and New Jersey

9 out of 10: California, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, New Mexico, New York and Vermont

8 out of 10: Delaware, District of Columbia, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin

7 out of 10: Colorado, Iowa, North Carolina and Pennsylvania

6 out of 10: Alabama, Illinois, Missouri, Rhode Island and Utah

5 out of 10: Arkansas, Florida, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota and Oklahoma

4 out of 10: Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Nebraska, Nevada, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia

3 out of 10: Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi and Wyoming

STATE-BY-STATE YOUTH DRUG OVERDOSE DEATH RANKINGS

Note: Rates include drug overdose deaths, for 2011-2013, a three-year average, for 12- to 25-year-olds. 1 = Highest rate of drug overdose fatalities, 50 = lowest rate of drug overdose fatalities. States with statistically significant (p<0.05) increases since 2005-2007 are noted with an asterisk (*), while states with a statistically significant decrease are noted with two asterisks (**).

1. West Virginia (12.6); 2. New Mexico (12.5); 3. Utah (12.1); 4. Pennsylvania (11.8); 5. Nevada (11.6); 6. New Jersey (10.7*); 7. Kentucky (10.5); 8. (tie) Arizona (10.2*) and Colorado (10.2*) and Delaware (10.2*); 11. Wyoming (9.8*); 12. Indiana (9.6); 13. Missouri (9.5*); 14. Oklahoma (9.4); 15. New Hampshire (9.3); 16. Ohio (9.1*); 17. Wisconsin (8.8*); 18. Maryland (8.5); 19. Arkansas (8.4); 20. Connecticut (8.3); 21. Illinois (8.2*); 22. Michigan (8.1*); 23. Massachusetts (7.8); 24. Alaska (7.2); 25. North Carolina (7.1); 26. (tie) Montana (7.0) and Tennessee (7.0**) and Vermont (7.0); 29. (tie) New York (6.9*) and Washington (6.9); 31. Oregon (6.5); 32. (tie) Alabama (6.2) and Louisiana (6.2**); 34. (tie) Rhode Island (6.0) and Texas (6.0); 36. (tie) Kansas (5.9) and Virginia (5.9); 38. (tie) Idaho (5.8) and South Carolina (5.8); 40. (tie) Florida (5.7**) and Minnesota (5.7*); 42. Georgia (5.2); 43. California (4.9*); 44. Maine (4.7**); 45. Hawaii (4.6); 46. Iowa (4.3); 47. (tie) Mississippi (3.7**) and Nebraska (3.7); 49. South Dakota (3.3); 50. North Dakota (2.2).

###

Trust for America’s Health is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to saving lives by protecting the health of every community and working to make disease prevention a national priority.

New TFAH Report Focuses on Priority Policies for Reducing Toxic Stress and Adverse Childhood Experiences

Washington, D.C., November 3, 2015— A new report, A Healthy Early Childhood Action Plan: Policies for a Lifetime of Well-being, released today by the Trust for America’s Health (TFAH), highlights more than 40 policy target areas that are key to achieving national goals of reducing toxic stress and Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and improving the lives of millions of children.

Living with prolonged stress and/or adverse experiences can significantly increase a child’s risk for a range of physical, mental and behavioral problems – increasing the likelihood for hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, cognitive and developmental disorders, depression, anxiety and a range of other concerns.

Currently, around one-quarter of children ages 5 and younger live in poverty and more than half of all children experience at least one ACE. According to research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than one-quarter of children experience physical abuse (28.3 percent) and substance abuse in the household (26.9 percent) while sexual abuse (24.7 percent for girls and 16 percent for boys) and parent divorce or separation (23.3 percent) are also prevalent.

“More and more studies show investing in early childhood pays off in a lifetime of better health and well-being,” said Jeffrey Levi, PhD, executive director of TFAH. “There are dozens of policy levers we can and should be pushing to ensure all children have high-quality preventive healthcare; safe, stable, nurturing relationships, homes and communities; good nutrition and enough physical activity; and positive early learning experiences.”

The report calls for increased public health engagement in early childhood areas, with a series of recommendations including to:

Build beyond the traditional healthcare system by integrating health and other social supports, including accountable health communities for children, by:

Ensuring every child has access to high-quality and affordable healthcare;
Building systems to help identify and provide support for children’s needs beyond the traditional medical system, but that have a major impact on health;
Focusing on a two generation approach to healthcare – and social service support;
Modernizing and expanding the availability of mental health and substance misuse treatment services – for both parents and children;
Expanding the focus of a trauma-informed approach across a wider range of federal, state and locally supported services; and
Improving services and care coordination for Children and Youth with Special Healthcare Needs (CYSHCN).

Promote protective, healthy communities and establish expert and technical assistance backbone support to help spread and scale programs nationally and in every state, by:

Improving the collection, analysis and integration of child health, well-being and services data to better assess trends and target services and programs;
Strengthening the role of federal, state and local health departments as the chief health strategist in communities; and
Establishing a support organization in every state that provides expertise and technical assistance.

Increase investments in core, effective early childhood policies and programs, by:

Making programs and services that promote early childhood well-being a higher priority to ensure they can be delivered on a scale to help all families (ranging from home visiting programs to child welfare services to increasing economic opportunity for families to child care and early education); and
Better aligning systems and financial resources to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of health, social services and education services.

The report includes a series of maps showing the status of different states on key trends and policy areas and case studies of evidence-based and model programs, organizations and initiatives—which are putting these recommendations into action—including the Nurse Family Partnership, Family Check Up Models, Abriendo Puertas/Opening Doors, Good Behavior Game, Child-Parent Center Program, Crittenton Children’s Center at Saint Luke’s Health System, Wholesome Wave, Community Asthma Initiative at Boston Children’s Hospital and many others.

“If we work together across sectors – bringing together the collective energy and resources of diverse partners – we will have a better chance of achieving the common goal of a healthy start for all of America’s children,” said Gail Christopher, chair of TFAH’s Board of Directors and vice president for policy and senior advisor at the WK Kellogg Foundation. “This report shines a light on many promising policies and programs. But the question remains whether we can garner the public will to turn the potential into the promise that improves the lives of our next generation.”

The full report was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

###

Increasing Access to Breastfeeding Friendly Hospitals: The Iowa Experience

By Jane Stockton, Community Health Consultant, Bureau of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Iowa Department of Public Health & Catherine Lillehoj, Ph.D. Research Analyst, Iowa Department of Public Health

The Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) has a long tradition of striving to improve the health and wellness of all residents. Because breastfeeding is a key strategy to preventing obesity among children and youth, IDPH has worked for the past several years to increase rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration.

Five years ago, Iowa ranked 31 out of 53 states and territories on a national survey, the Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care (mPINC). When we looked a little deeper, we realized that the rural nature of our state made maternal nutrition and care somewhat difficult.

For instance, 89 percent of Iowa counties are considered rural, with hospitals in rural counties having a higher proportion of Medicaid births (40 to 60 percent of births). Sadly, these hospitals often don’t have the necessary resources to truly improve breastfeeding education and provide the appropriate technical assistance. In general, rural hospitals experience unique barriers due to distance between hospitals, patients and other facilities, plus staff are often not dedicated to working in maternity care units.

To get over these hurdles, IDPH targeted hospitals in rural counties with significant numbers of Medicaid births. One of the preliminary activities to improve breastfeeding was to meet with key hospital partners (e.g., OB managers, Chief Nursing Officers, Directors of Nursing, Educators). Along with key partners, hospital policies related to breastfeeding were reviewed and results of the mPINC survey were discussed. Following these initial meetings, 53 hospitals voluntarily completed a pre-assessment using a self-appraisal tool. Subsequently, the IDPH hosted a training, called 6 Steps 4 Success, which we developed specifically to address the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding, a set of evidence-based practices that have been shown to increase breastfeeding initiation and duration.

After receiving technical assistance, resources and staff education, 37 of the 53 hospitals completed a post-assessment. The majority of the hospitals implemented at least three of the Ten Steps and the most widely adopted policy, encouraging breastfeeding on demand, was implemented by 83 percent of the hospitals. After attending the 6 Steps 4 Success training, one nurse stated, “This gave me a lot to think about. I have changed my position and going to change my ideas, way I promote breastfeeding.” Hospitals frequently express their gratitude for the technical assistance and education being brought to them in their rural setting, rather than having to go to the larger cities for these services.

To further enhance statewide breastfeeding initiatives, efforts for the past two years have focused on improving maternity practice in four or five hospitals each year that meet three criteria: rural location, Medicaid birth rate higher than statewide average and an mPINC score of less than the statewide composite score. Using their mPINC survey data, hospitals are given assistance in reviewing the results, determining where the greatest opportunities for improvement are, and developing an improvement plan to address at least two of the dimensions of care. Over the course of one year, hospitals are offered:

Technical assistance related to breastfeeding policy – telephone, face-to-face, electronic messaging;
Resources – desk references such as Hale’s Medications and Mother’s Milk, Continuity of care in Breastfeeding: Best Practices in the Maternity setting; model breastfeeding policy, and a Self Attachment video;
Educational opportunities – funding to send one staff nurse to Certified Lactation Counselor (or comparable) training, Breastfeeding Education for Iowa Communities, a four hour training developed by the Iowa Breastfeeding Coalition, and/or 6 Steps 4 Success training; and
Networking opportunities – Iowa’s Annual Breastfeeding Conference and networking call for all participating hospitals.

The most recent data indicate all participating hospitals demonstrated improvement in several areas including: Labor and delivery practice (an improvement ranging from 3 to 230 percent), Staff Training (63 percent improvement), Breastfeeding Assistance (18 percent improvement), and Structural and Organizational Aspects of Care (94 percent improvement). In addition, staff who became Certified Lactation Counselors are now educating other nurses in their hospital.

To truly make these activities pervasive and sustainable, the IDPH knew it was important to collaborate with key partners with valuable expertise, including:

University of Iowa Statewide Perinatal Team – Breastfeeding Guidelines were written and incorporated into the Guidelines for Perinatal Services published by IDPH and distributed by the University of Iowa’s Perinatal Care Program. The Guidelines for Perinatal Services provides the framework to be used in defining and evaluating the level of perinatal services being offered by hospitals.
Iowa Breastfeeding Coalition – Breastfeeding Education for Iowa Communities, a four hour training curriculum, is being presented to healthcare communities throughout the state. The training curriculum, based on WIC’s Grow and Glow curriculum, was written as a collaborative effort by IDPH staff and ICBLC members of the coalition.

Over the past five years Iowa hospitals have gone from understanding what the term “Baby Friendly” meant and about the significance of the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding, to having one hospital designated as Baby Friendly and many other hospitals in the process of achieving that designation

_______________________________

References

Lillehoj, C. & Dobson, B. (2012). Implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Steps in Iowa Hospitals. http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/onlineLibraryTPS.asp?DOI=10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01411.x&ArticleID=1043603.

A Healthy Early Childhood Action Plan: Policies for a Lifetime of Well-being

TFAH Commends President Obama and Congressional Leadership for Securing the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015

Washington, D.C., October 28, 2015 – The Trust for America’s Health (TFAH) commends President Obama and Congressional leadership for the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, and is pleased to announce its support for this legislation. The following is a statement from Jeffrey Levi, PhD, executive director of TFAH.

“This agreement is an important step toward ensuring the nation has adequate resources to help people be healthy, happy and productive. TFAH calls on Congress to pass the Bipartisan Budget Act.

By largely replacing sequestration’s harmful cuts—which forced historically low and grossly inadequate funding for critical public health programs—Congress is now able to increase investments in vital public health and other domestic programs that keep Americans healthy, safe, and secure.

TFAH recommends Congress use this funding to invest in programs that build a public health system that focuses on preventing disease in the first place by restoring funding to chronic disease programs—such as Partnerships to Improve Community Health, Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health and Tips From Former Smokers—at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. These programs support proven strategies that prevent and control the development of numerous chronic diseases.

We also urge Congress to pass appropriations bills that do not include ideologically driven, partisan policy riders that could threaten the implementation of this historic deal.

Every American deserves to be healthy. By maintaining funding for the Prevention and Public Health Fund and passing this Act, the nation’s leaders will have finally signaled that they are serious about providing the support needed to keep Americans healthy and happy.”

###

TFAH Statement: Lancet Commission and White House Summit Highlight Urgent Need to Address Climate Change Health Threats

Washington, DC, June 23, 2015 – The following is a statement from Jeffrey Levi, PhD, executive director of the Trust for America’s Health (TFAH) on the White House Climate and Health Summit and release of the 2015 Lancet Commission on Health and Climate change report this morning.

“For too long, the country has buried its head in the sand when it comes to the threats climate change poses to our health.

The new Lancet Commission on Health and Climate Change report raises the stakes, clearing defining the consequences of inaction – but also presents a silver lining of how action now can help mitigate the problems of tomorrow.

That is why the White House Climate and Health Summit on Tuesday is so critical – bringing together U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy and leading experts to help build a path forward. But, to have a real ongoing impact, we need more than a one day forum. We need a sustained approach—across agencies—that strategically aligns programs and policies to address climate change and health.

This sustained approach should include the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services committing to ensuring that all its programs address the impact of climate change on health and the White House mobilizing every federal agency to consider the health implications of climate change when performing their duties.

We know that, as climate and weather patterns shift, they contribute to the emergence of new diseases and the reemergence or spread of diseases that were nearly eradicated or thought to be under control. As changes in temperature and weather patterns allow pathogens to expand into different geographic regions, some vector- and zoonotic-borne diseases may increase along with foodborne and waterborne diseases. Excessively high temperatures, heavy downpours, wildfires, severe droughts, permafrost thawing, ocean acidification, sea-level rise and other extreme weather events all have implications for public health.

In the Trust for America’s Health annual Outbreaks: Protecting Americans from Infectious Diseases report, we found that only 15 states have complete climate change adaptation plans – including planning for the impact of climate change on human health.

We know that climate change is affecting every sector of American society, making addressing this issue the urgent responsibility of every government program and agency. There’s no time like the present to safeguard the future health and wealth of the country.”

###

The Facts Hurt: A State-By-State Injury Prevention Policy Report

Issue Brief: Top Actions the United States Should Take to Prepare for MERS-CoV and Other Emerging Infections

Fostering Community Resilience: How one Indiana Community Meshed its Resources to Improve Preparedness

By Justin Mast, RN, BSN, CEN, FAWM, Senior Crisis and Continuity Advisor, MESH

Seven years ago, Wishard Memorial Hospital, now Eskenazi Health, was one of five organizations to receive a $5 million grant from the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response to create innovative public health and healthcare emergency response and management models.

To try something new, Dr. Charles Miramonti, an emergency department physician, looked at relationships, policy and technology. Ultimately, he created a team of healthcare leaders from all of the area’s major hospitals, known as the M anaged Emergency Surge for Healthcare (MESH) Coalition, based in Indianapolis.

Initially, MESH created a framework for sharing resources, a centralized cache of supplies, protocols for coordinated emergency response efforts and training opportunities. All these efforts better centralized preparedness functions across the Central Indiana region.

After building the coalition, marshalling resources and creating efficiencies in public health preparedness, to continue our work, we hosted a work group to focus on disaster planning for children, mothers and expecting mothers.

Quickly, we realized that we had to build community resiliency and that there was a significant vulnerable population that hadn’t been fully addressed when it comes to preparing for emergencies: children who are dependent on electric equipment, most notably ventilators.

During weather events, we found that families with children on ventilators were coming to the emergency room to ensure they would have electricity. They often brought other family members and stayed for the duration of the storm.

To look at the problem, we took three steps:

Fact finding and research;
Creating a registry of children in the state who are dependent on ventilators; and
Writing an educational toolkit for families and providers (also in Spanish).

First, we wanted to see if there were places other than hospitals that would be able to maintain a power supply during an emergency. It would be beneficial to the entire community to keep people out of the hospital if they didn’t need urgent care at that moment—as long as we could safeguard their health.

We spoke with emergency personal in every county to get a sense of what resources existed and what needs there were—we needed to know if it was possible to give families another location they could go to during an emergency. Ultimately, we developed a database that includes 181 power safe facilities with nearly two locations for every county.

While having the alternate locations mapped was great, they would only be helpful if we could identify and inform the families that would need to use them. So, we built a HIPAA compliant registry that parents can use to register their ventilator-dependent children.

The third piece of the puzzle was informing and educating families and responders. We wanted to give families tools to connect with local resources because it’s far easier—in more rural areas—to get to those places during an emergency. We also wanted to empower families to reach out to these services and personnel, which would make the connections even stronger.

So, we created tools, including a video (also in Spanish), to educate families on how weather could impact the power supply their children depended on. The toolkit includes draft letters families can send to authorities—such as EMS and fire—to let them know in advance there is an electrically dependent patient in the household.

We then gave the toolkit to hospital nurses to pass along to families at discharge. And, throughout the development, we partnered with the Indiana Emergency Medical Services for Children (IEMSC), Indiana State Department of Health and other partners whom were instrumental in creating the toolkit and spreading the resources across the state.

We also worked with medical equipment providers and let them know that there are resources for families. They were extremely happy to provide information on the toolkit and registry to their patients.

It’s hard to believe that just five years ago each individual Central Indiana hospital and healthcare facility prepared to face a public health emergency on its own—completely apart from the other resources, infrastructure and partners, just down the road.

Now, the MESH Coalition is helping providers prepare for and respond to emergency events and communities remain viable and resilient through recovery.

We know that, by forging these innovative partners, we have saved millions of dollars on redundant equipment and emergency supplies. Through all of these efforts, the MESH Coalition is building resilience in the healthcare sector and improving everyday life for Hoosiers.