U.S. Obesity Rates at Historic Highs – Nine States Reach Adult Obesity Rates of 35 Percent or More

 Report Calls for Sugary Drink Taxes, Expanded SNAP and WIC Nutrition Support Programs and a built environment that encourages physical activity to Help Address Health Crisis

(Washington, DC – September 12, 2019) – Nine U.S. states had adult obesity rates above 35 percent in 2018, up from seven states at that level in 2017, an historic level of obesity in the U.S., according to the 16th annual State of Obesity: Better Policies for a Healthier America report released today by the Trust for America’s Health (TFAH).

The report based in part on newly released data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and analysis by TFAH, provides an annual snapshot of obesity rates nationwide.  The State of Obesity series and this report were made possible by funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Obesity has serious health consequences including increased risk for type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, stroke and many types of cancers. Obesity is estimated to increase national healthcare spending by $149 billion annually (about half of which is paid for by Medicare and Medicaid) and being overweight or obese is the most common reason young adults are ineligible for military service.

Obesity rates vary considerably between states with Mississippi and West Virginia having the highest level of adult obesity in the nation at 39.5 percent and Colorado having the lowest rate at 23.0 percent.

For the first time, adult obesity rates were above 35 percent in nine states in 2018: Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota and West Virginia.

As recently as 2012, no state had an adult obesity rate over 35 percent and within the last five years (2013 and 2018) 33 states had statistically significant increases in their rates of adult obesity.

“These latest data shout that our national obesity crisis is getting worse,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health. “They tell us that almost 50 years into the upward curve of obesity rates we haven’t yet found the right mix of programs to stop the epidemic.   Isolated programs and calls for life-style changes aren’t enough.  Instead, our report highlights the fundamental changes that are needed in the social and economic conditions that make it challenging for people to eat healthy foods and get sufficient exercise.”


Differential Impact Amongst Minority Populations

The report highlights that obesity levels are closely tied to social and economic conditions and that individuals with lower incomes are more at risk. People of color, who are more likely to live in neighborhoods with few options for healthy foods and physical activity, and, are the target of widespread marketing of unhealthy foods, are at elevated risk.

As of 2015-2016, the latest available data, nearly half of Latino (47 percent) and Black adults (46.8) had obesity while adult obesity rates among White and Asian adults were 37.9 percent and 12.7 percent respectively.  Incidence of childhood obesity was highest amongst Latino children at 25.8 percent while 22 percent of Black children had obesity, 14 percent of White children had obesity and 11 percent of Asian children had obesity.


What Could Work?

While the obesity rates are alarming, there are new data offering the promise of policies that combat the epidemic, namely promoting healthier food for children through revamped WIC food packages and fostering behavior change through taxes on sugary drinks.

  • Obesity rates for children enrolled in WIC (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children) continue to decline, from 15.9 percent in 2010 to 13.9 percent in 2016. In 2009, the USDA updated WIC food packages to more closely meet recommended national dietary guidelines including the addition of more fruits, vegetables and whole grains and reduced fat levels in milk and infant formula. A Los Angeles County study published this year found that 4-year-olds who had received the revised WIC food package since birth had reduced risk for obesity.
  • A number of U.S. cities and the Navajo Nation have passed local taxes on sugary drinks that are showing promise as a means to change consumers’ beverage habits. Studies of a 1-cent per ounce tax in Berkeley, California and a 1.5 cent per ounce tax in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania found that the consumption of sugary drinks decreased significantly after the tax was imposed.

“Policies such as these are proving effective in changing behavior. But, no single solution – however promising – is sufficient.  Obesity is a complex problem and will need multi-sector, multi-factor solutions,” said TFAH’s Auerbach.

“Creating the conditions that allow people to more easily make healthy choices is central to preventing obesity, as is prioritizing investment in those communities most affected by the crisis,” Auerbach said.


Recommendations for Policy Action

The report includes 31 recommendations for policy action by federal, state and local government, across several sectors, designed to improve access to nutritious foods and provide safe opportunities for physical activity, while minimizing harmful marketing and advertising tactics.

Among the report’s recommendations for policies to address the obesity crisis are:

  • Expand the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) to age 6 for children and for two years postpartum for mothers and fully fund the WIC breastfeeding Peer Counseling Program.
  • Increase the price of sugary drinks through excise taxes and use the revenue to address health and socioeconomic disparities.
  • Ensure that CDC has enough funding to grant every state appropriate funding to implement evidence-based obesity prevention strategies (currently, CDC only has enough funding to work with 16 states).
  • Make it more difficult to market unhealthy food to children by ending federal tax loopholes and business costs deductions related to the advertising of such foods to young audiences.
  • Fully fund the Student Support and Academic Enrichment program and other federal programs that support student physical education.
  • Encourage safe physical activity by funding Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS), Complete Streets, Vision Zero and other pedestrian safety initiatives through federal transportation and infrastructure funding.
  • Ensure that anti-hunger and nutrition-assistance programs, like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), WIC, and others follow the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and make access to nutritious food a core program tenet.
  • Strengthen and expand school nutrition programs beyond federal standards to include universal meals, flexible breakfasts and eliminate all unhealthy food marketing to students.
  • Enforce existing laws that direct most health insurers to cover obesity-related preventive services at no-cost sharing to patients.
  • Cover evidence-based comprehensive pediatric weight management programs and services in Medicaid.

 

State by State rates of adult obesity – highest to lowest

Tie: Mississippi and West Virginia (39.5%), 3. Arkansas (37.1%), 4. Louisiana (36.8%), 5. Kentucky (36.6%), 6. Alabama (36.2%), 7. Iowa (35.3%), 8. North Dakota (35.1%), 9. Missouri, (35.0%),  10. – Tie: Oklahoma and Texas (34.8%), 12. – Tie: Kansas and Tennessee (34.4%), 14. South Carolina (34.3 %), 15. – Tie: Indiana and Nebraska (34.1%), 17. Ohio (34.0%), 18. Delaware (33.5%), 19 – Tie: Michigan, North Carolina (33.0), 21. Georgia (32.5%), 22. New Mexico (32.3%), 23. Wisconsin (32.0%), 24. Illinois (31.8%), 25. – Tie: Maryland and Pennsylvania (30.9%), 27. Florida (30.7%), 28 – Tie: Maine and Virginia (30.4%), 30. Tie: Minnesota and South Dakota (30.1%), 32. Oregon (29.9 %), 33. New Hampshire (29.6%), 34. Three-way Tie: Alaska, Arizona and Nevada (29.5%), 37. Wyoming (29.0%), 38. Washington (28.7%), 39. Idaho (28.4%), 40. Utah (27.8%), 41. Rhode Island (27.7%), 42. New York (27.6%), 43. Vermont (27.5%), 44. Connecticut (27.4%), 45. Montana (26.9%), 46. California (25.8%), 47. – Tie: Massachusetts and New Jersey (25.7%), 49. Hawaii (24.9%), 50. District of Columbia (24.7%), 51. Colorado (23.0%).

# # #

 

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority.  www.tfah.org. Twitter: @healthyamerica1

 

 

 

 

Tasas de obesidad en Estados Unidos con altos récords históricos

Nueve estados alcanzan tasas de obesidad en adultos superiores al 35 por ciento

El Reporte demanda por Impuestos para las Bebidas Azucaradas, Programas Ampliados de Apoyo Nutricional SNAP y WIC y un entorno que fomente la actividad física para ayudar a abordar la crisis de salud

(Washington, DC) – 12 de septiembre de 2019 – Nueve estados de EE. UU. Tenían tasas de obesidad en adultos superiores al 35 por ciento en 2018, en comparación con siete estados en ese nivel en 2017, un nivel histórico de obesidad en los EE. UU., Según el 16 ° Estado anual de Obesidad: mejores políticas para un informe más saludable de América publicado hoy por el Trust for America’s Health (TFAH).

El informe basado en parte en datos recientemente publicados del Sistema de Vigilancia del Factor de Riesgo del Comportamiento (BRFSS, por su sigla en ingles) de los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades, y el análisis realizado por TFAH, proporciona las tasas de obesidad anuales en todo el país. La serie El estado de la obesidad y este informe fueron posibles gracias a el financiamiento de la Fundación Robert Wood Johnson.

La obesidad tiene graves consecuencias para la salud, incluido un mayor riesgo de diabetes tipo 2, presión arterial alta, accidente cerebrovascular y muchos tipos de cáncer. Se estima que la obesidad aumenta el gasto nacional en atención médica en $ 149 billones anuales (aproximadamente la mitad de lo cual es pagado por Medicare y Medicaid) y el sobrepeso y la obesidad es la razón más común por la que los adultos jóvenes no son elegibles para el servicio militar.

Las tasas de obesidad varían considerablemente entre los estados, con Mississippi y West Virginia con el nivel más alto de obesidad en adultos en la nación con 39.5 por ciento y Colorado con la tasa más baja con 23.0 por ciento.

Por primera vez, las tasas de obesidad en adultos superaron el 35 por ciento en nueve estados en 2018: Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Dakota del Norte y Virginia Occidental.

No muy lejos atrás en el 2012, ningún estado tenía una tasa de obesidad en adultos superior al 35 por ciento y en los últimos cinco años (2013 y 2018) 33 estados tuvieron incrementos estadísticamente significativos en sus tasas de obesidad en adultos.

“Estos últimos datos indican que nuestra crisis nacional de obesidad está empeorando”, dijo John Auerbach, presidente y director ejecutivo de Trust for America’s Health. “Nos dicen que casi 50 años después de la curva ascendente de las tasas de obesidad todavía no hemos encontrado la combinación correcta de programas para detener la epidemia”. Los programas aislados y los llamados a cambios en el estilo de vida no son suficientes. En cambio, nuestro informe destaca los cambios fundamentales que se necesitan en las condiciones sociales y económicas que hacen que sea difícil para las personas comer alimentos saludables y hacer suficiente ejercicio “.

Impacto diferencial entre las poblaciones minoritarias

El informe destaca que los niveles de obesidad están estrechamente vinculados a las condiciones socioeconómicas. Las personas con ingresos más bajos están más en riesgo. Las comunidades de color, que tienen más probabilidades de vivir en vecindarios con pocas opciones de alimentos saludables y actividad física, y que a menudo son el objetivo de una comercialización generalizada de alimentos poco saludables, también tienen un riesgo elevado.

A partir de 2015-2016, casi la mitad de los adultos latinos (47 por ciento) y los adultos negros (46.8) tenían obesidad, mientras que las tasas de obesidad entre adultos blancos y asiáticos fueron de 37.9 por ciento y 12.7 por ciento respectivamente. La incidencia de obesidad también fue más alta entre los niños latinos con un 25.8 por ciento, mientras que el 22 por ciento de los niños negros tienen obesidad, el 14 por ciento de los niños blancos tienen obesidad y el 11 por ciento de los niños asiáticos tienen obesidad.

¿Qué podría funcionar?

Si bien las tasas de obesidad son alarmantes, hay nuevos datos que ofrecen la promesa de políticas que combaten la obesidad, como promover alimentos más saludables para los niños a través de paquetes de alimentos renovados de WIC y fomentar el cambio de comportamiento a través de impuestos sobre las bebidas azucaradas.

  • Las tasas de obesidad para los niños inscritos en WIC (Programa Especial de Nutrición Suplementaria para Mujeres, Bebés y Niños) continúa disminuyendo, de 15.9 por ciento en 2010 a 13.9 por ciento en 2016. En 2009, el Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos (USDA, por su siglas en inglés) actualizó los paquetes de alimentos de WIC para cumplir más estrechamente con las recomendaciones nacionales. pautas dietéticas que incluyen la adición de más frutas, verduras y granos integrales y niveles reducidos de grasa en la leche y la fórmula infantil. Un estudio del condado de Los Ángeles publicado este año encontró que los niños de 4 años que habían recibido el paquete de alimentos WIC revisado desde su nacimiento habían reducido los riegos de padecer obesidad.
  • Varias ciudades de EE. UU. Y la Nación Navajo han aprobado impuestos locales sobre las bebidas azucaradas que se muestran prometedoras como un medio para cambiar los hábitos de bebidas de los consumidores. Los estudios de un impuesto de 1 centavo por onza en Berkeley, California y un impuesto de 1,5 centavos por onza en Filadelfia, Pensilvania, encontraron que el consumo de bebidas azucaradas disminuyó significativamente después de la imposición del impuesto.

“Políticas como estas están demostrando ser efectivas para cambiar el comportamiento. Pero, ninguna solución única, por prometedora que sea, es suficiente. La obesidad es un problema complejo y necesitará soluciones multisectoriales y multifactoriales “, dijo Auerbach de TFAH.

“Crear las condiciones que permitan a las personas tomar decisiones saludables con mayor facilidad es fundamental para prevenir la obesidad, al igual que priorizar la inversión en las comunidades más afectadas por la crisis”, dijo Auerbach.

Recomendaciones para la acción política

El informe incluye 31 recomendaciones para la acción política del gobierno federal, estatal y local, en varios sectores, diseñado para mejorar el acceso a alimentos nutritivos y proporcionar oportunidades seguras para la actividad física, al tiempo que minimiza las tácticas perjudiciales de marketing y publicidad.

Entre las recomendaciones del informe para las políticas para abordar la crisis de obesidad están:

  • Ampliar el Programa Especial de Nutrición Suplementaria para Mujeres, Bebés y Niños (WIC) a los 6 años para niños y durante dos años después del parto para las madres y financiar completamente el Programa de Orientación de Pares de WIC para la lactancia materna.
  • Aumentar el precio de las bebidas azucaradas mediante impuestos especiales y utilizar los ingresos para abordar las disparidades socioeconómicas y de salud.
  • Asegurarse de que los CDC tengan los recursos suficientes para otorgar a cada estado fondos apropiados para implementar estrategias de prevención de la obesidad basadas en evidencia (actualmente, los CDC solo tienen fondos suficientes para trabajar con 16 estados).
  • Hacer que sea más difícil comercializar alimentos no saludables para los niños al poner fin a los vacíos fiscales federales y las deducciones de costos comerciales relacionados con la publicidad de dichos alimentos para el público joven.
  • Financiar completamente el programa de Apoyo al Estudiante y Enriquecimiento Académico y otros programas federales que apoyan la educación física del estudiante.
  • Fomentar la actividad física segura mediante la financiación de Rutas Seguras a las Escuelas (SRTS), Complete Streets, Vision Zero y otras iniciativas de seguridad para peatones a través de fondos federales de infraestructura y transporte.
  • Asegurar de que los programas contra el hambre y la asistencia nutricional, como el Programa de Nutrición Suplementaria (SNAP), WIC y otros, sigan las Pautas dietéticas para estadounidenses y hagan del acceso a alimentos nutritivos un principio básico del programa.
  • Fortalecer y expandir los programas de nutrición escolar más allá de los estándares federales para incluir comidas universales, desayunos flexibles y eliminar todo el mercadeo de alimentos poco saludables para los estudiantes.
  • Hacer cumplir las leyes existentes que ordenan a la mayoría de las aseguradoras de salud que cubran los servicios preventivos relacionados con la obesidad sin costo compartido para los pacientes.
  • Cubrir el manejo del programa integral del peso pediátrico basado en evidencia y servicios en Medicaid.

Tasas de obesidad adulta por estado, de mayor a menor:

1. (Empatados): Mississippi and Virginia Occidental (39.5%), Arkansas (37.1%), 4. Louisiana (36.8%), 5. Kentucky (36.6%), 6. Alabama (36.2%), 7. Iowa (35.3%), 8. Dakota del Norte (35.1%), 9. Missouri, (35.0%), 10. – Empatados: Oklahoma and Texas (34.8%), 12. – Empatados: Kansas and Tennessee (34.4%), 14.  Carolina del Sur (34.3 %), 15. – : Indiana and Nebraska (34.1%), 17. Ohio (34.0%), 18. Delaware (33.5%), 19 – Empatados: Michigan, Carolina del Norte (33.0), 21. Georgia (32.5%), 22. Nuevo Mexico (32.3%), 23. Wisconsin (32.0%), 24. Illinois (31.8%), 25. – Empatados: Maryland and Pennsylvania (30.9%), 27. Florida (30.7%), 28 – Empatados: Maine and Virginia (30.4%), 30. Empatados: Minnesota and Dakota del Sur (30.1%), 32. Oregon (29.9 %), 33. New Hampshire (29.6%), 34. Empatados: Alaska, Arizona and Nevada (29.5%), 37. Wyoming (29.0%), 38. Washington (28.7%), 39. Idaho (28.4%), 40. Utah (27.8%), 41. Rhode Island (27.7%), 42. Nueva York (27.6%), 43. Vermont (27.5%), 44. Connecticut (27.4%), 45. Montana (26.9%), 46. California (25.8%), 47. – Empatados: Massachusetts and Nueva Jersey (25.7%), 49. Hawaii (24.9%), 50. Districto de Columbia (24.7%), 51. Colorado (23.0%).

# # #

 

Trust for America’s Health es una organización sin fines de lucro y no partidista que promueve la salud óptima para cada persona y comunidad y hace de la prevención de enfermedades una prioridad nacional. WWW.tfah.org

 

Adding Years to Life, and Life to Years: A Case Study of Public Health’s Contribution to Healthy Aging in Oregon

Life expectancy at birth in the U.S. has doubled over the past one-and-a-half centuries jumping from 40 years in 1850 to 80 years in 2000. In 1950 approximately eight percent of the U.S. population (12 million people) was over 65 years of age. In 2015, that percent had almost doubled to 15 percent (45 million people). Today, Americans reaching the age of 65 can expect, on average, to live an additional 19 years.

Our country can significantly benefit from the contributions and experiences of older Americans, but we also must recognize and meet the challenges commensurate with the growing population of Americans 65 and older. All sectors should be engaged in promoting healthy aging, but public health – in particular – has a very distinct role to play to ensure that our older citizens experience a full life for as long as possible. After all, the public health sector has played a significant role in helping Americans to live longer, so we also have an important role to play to ensure those longer lives are full and productive.

What is Healthy Aging?

Healthy aging is defined as: 1) promoting health, preventing injury and managing chronic conditions; 2) optimizing physical, cognitive and mental health; and 3) facilitating social engagement. This definition intentionally does not equate healthy aging with the absence of disease and disability. Instead, it portrays healthy aging as both an adaptive process in response to the challenges that can occur as we age and a proactive process to reduce the likelihood, intensity, or impact of future challenges. It calls for maximizing physical, mental, emotional, and social wellbeing, while recognizing that aging often is accompanied by chronic illnesses and functional limitations, including lifelong conditions. While the public health sector has experience and skill in addressing these components of health for some populations, it has not traditionally focused such attention on older adults.

The Role of Public Health in Healthy Aging

Trust for America’s Health (TFAH), in partnership with The John A. Hartford Foundation, held
a convening called A Public Health Framework to Support the Improvement of the Health and
Wellbeing of Older Adults, in Tampa, Florida on October 27, 2017. National, state, and local
public health officials; aging experts, advocates, and service providers; and healthcare officials came together to discuss how public health could contribute to an age-friendly society and improve the health and wellbeing of older Americans. The result is a Framework for an Age-Friendly Public Health System that includes five potent roles for public health in the healthy
aging effort:

  1. Connecting and convening multiple sectors and professions that provide the
    supports, services, and infrastructure to promote healthy aging.
  2. Coordinating existing supports and services to avoid duplication of efforts, identify gaps, and increase access to services and supports.
  3. Collecting data to assess community health status (including inequities) and aging population needs to inform the development of interventions.
  4. Conducting, communicating, and disseminating research findings and best practices to support healthy aging.
  5. Complementing and supplementing existing supports and services, particularly in
    terms of integrating clinical and population health approaches.

The Framework outlines the functions that public health could fulfill, in collaboration with aging services, to address the challenges and opportunities of an aging society. Not every community will have the capacity to fulfill all these roles, and some roles are already being filled by other entities. Advancing the public health sector’s involvement in healthy aging needs to be guided by, and in partnership with, such organizations. Furthermore, public health organizations may lack sufficient capacity to undertake such activities and will need to carefully and thoughtfully determine how and where to focus their limited resources (e.g., braiding current streams of funding for public health activities). The emerging challenges associated with an aging population in the context of serious fiscal limitations within our communities means that we must find efficient models of supports and services that align with the framework’s approach. Oregon provides just such a model.

The Oregon Model

Oregon has taken a unique and cost-effective approach to addressing the needs and opportunities of its more than 660,000 people older than 65 years by co-locating the State Unit on Aging’s Long-Term Care Program Analyst (Program Analyst) within the Public Health Division offices. Although this was not always the case, this nontraditional co-location creates efficiencies, eliminates silos, and enhances coordination and collaboration between the two Oregon state agencies that provide health supports to Oregonians.

Like other states, Oregon’s public health and aging services are separate and distinct in funding, personnel, location, and services provided. The Department of Human Services State Unit on Aging (SUA) is responsible for overseeing implementation of the Older Americans Act,

Medicaid long-term care supports and services, Adult Protective Services (APS), and Oregon Project Independence. It works with the 17 Area Agencies on Aging which help to administer all the services and supports for older Oregonians. The Program Analyst works with Oregon’s aging services network to promote community implementation of evidence-based health promotion strategies addressing chronic disease self-management, falls prevention, physical activity and healthy eating, Alzheimer’s caregiving, and other preventive services.

Medicaid long-term care supports and services, Adult Protective Services (APS), and Oregon Project Independence. It works with the 17 Area Agencies on Aging which help to administer all the services and supports for older Oregonians. The Program Analyst works with Oregon’s aging services network to promote community implementation of evidence-based health promotion strategies addressing chronic disease self-management, falls prevention, physical activity and healthy eating, Alzheimer’s caregiving, and other preventive services.

Although Oregon’s public health division has not historically included healthy aging in its portfolio of programs, its Cross-Agency Systems Manager now devotes part of her time to healthy aging and collaborates frequently with the Program Analyst. The co-location in the public health division offices enhances opportunities for working together, limits redundancies, enables the sharing of key data, leverages funding between the divisions, and overall, helps to
create an age-friendly public health system in Oregon.

The Roles of the Program Analyst and Alignment with the Framework

When aligned with the five roles of public health within the Framework, the Oregon model provides an informative and, importantly, doable model for other public health systems across the country.

1. Connecting and convening

Healthy aging requires the active contribution of a variety of stakeholders. Indeed, many different organizations and professionals are working to support healthy aging and public health can help to connect and convene the multiple sectors and professions that provide the supports, services, policies and infrastructure to promote healthy aging.

Oregon’s Long-Term Care Program Analyst provides a link between the health department and the state’s 17 agencies on aging – a significant alignment as they are primarily responsible for providing information and services to seniors and people with disabilities across Oregon. Engaging public health with the agencies on aging provides a crucial connection between the two entities, particularly as local public health grantees are required to work with those agencies to ensure that seniors benefit from public health programs and services. The Program Analyst also facilitates partnerships with other statewide aging services, aging advocacy, and long-term care entities. These public-private partnerships are critical in addressing issues including the need for expanded respite services, the growing impact of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, and housing and transportation needs.

Oregon’s State Plan on Aging (developed every four years to guide SUA programs and activities) requires SUA staff to collaborate across programs and work to include positive approaches and practices across the elder services delivery networks. The Program Analyst supports these efforts by bringing the needs of older adults into this planning process.

2. Coordinating existing supports and services

Navigating the wide variety of supports and services for older adults can be confusing and overwhelming for older adults, their families, and other professionals. A second possible role for public health is therefore to coordinate existing supports and services to avoid duplication of efforts, identify gaps, increase access to services and supports, and ensure that older adults are not overlooked in any other public health programming or research.

Together health department staff and the Program Analyst help to ensure that programs run between the two agencies are complementary and not duplicative. They work closely with the Oregon Health Authority (Oregon’s single state Medicaid agency) regarding older adult mental and behavioral health and public health efforts impacting older adults. The Oregon Health Authority received state funding in 2015 to develop a statewide network of older adult behavioral health specialists. These individuals are working closely with elder services offices, community mental health agencies and others to develop closer coordination and support for older adults dealing with mental health needs. Oregon’s Program Analyst provides technical assistance to the area agencies on aging to aid in the implementation of the Older American’s Act and other federally-funded initiatives. Finally, the state public health division and Aging and People with Disabilities office partner on various initiatives to address chronic disease prevention and management, falls prevention, immunizations, and a new focus on oral health. iv

3. Collecting data

An important role of public health is to gather, analyze and disseminate demographic and health information. Such core public health activities can call attention to the needs and assets of a community’s aging population, inform the development of interventions and help set goals (and define measures) for health improvement. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) administered by the CDC includes two modules that states have the option of using to assess and track two issues crucial to the health and well-being of older adults: the cognitive decline module and the caregiver module. The Oregon chapter of the Alzheimer’s Association encouraged the state legislature to fund these aging modules, making Oregon one of only seven states to collect data for both modules. Oregon utilizes additional BRFSS measures to cross walk multiple risk factors to better tune and align their efforts, such as the general physical and mental health indicators. In addition, Oregon created a healthy aging index in 2015 to prioritize and monitor key data indicators that inform investments in infrastructure to support health across the life span. Ensuring the use of public health data galvanizes partners toward common goals and objectives. And Oregon’s State Health Improvement Plan 2015-2019 identified oral health in older adults as a focus area for improvement and is using the BRFSS to track this data. The Program Analyst helps to oversee the collection and analysis of these data.

4. Conducting, communicating, disseminating research/best practices

Public health researchers, policymakers, and practitioners can play key roles in supporting healthy aging by conducting, communicating, and disseminating research findings and best practices to empower individuals to engage in healthy behaviors, support the provision of effective services, and contribute to the create of safe and healthy community environments. Indeed, there is a large body of research concerning healthy aging, yet limited clearinghouses for interested parties to find best practices or resources. Public health organizations could provide central locations for information on healthy aging, including best practices, toolkits, and research. The ready availability of such a site would enhance the capacity of other sectors and professions to address the needs of older adults.

Despite a lack of funding for communication, Oregon’s Public Health Division works with their aging partners to promote messaging directed toward older adults. Using the Public Health Division’s communication infrastructure to develop a story arc on Place Matters Oregon, the health department has been successful at accelerating and raising the civic conversation in Oregon. Place Matters Oregon now shares the lived experiences of older adults, reinforcing the importance of place and space on one’s ability to thrive as we age. Additionally, the department published the Health Within Reach Blog and Data Within Reach Webinar. This webinar outperformed all previous webinars and the Healthy Aging blog was the second most reviewed Health Within Reach blog post since it began; both demonstrating the opportunity and the need for public health to be informing conversations about aging in Oregon.

5. Complementing and supplementing existing supports

The fifth possible role for public health is complementing and supplementing existing supports and services, particularly in terms of integrating clinical and population health approaches. Existing public health programs address a wide range of health issues, from infectious disease to chronic disease; from education campaigns that reach the general public to targeted and focused home visits by educators; from the enforcement of environmental regulations addressing longterm health risks like clean air and water to the response to rare and catastrophic events. Furthermore, public health is focused on the entire life course, providing programs and policies such as maternal and child health, workplace safety, and tobacco-free initiatives, that ultimately support healthy aging later in life. Each of these current activities could be assessed to determine if they are adequately meeting the needs of older adults and, when not, modified to better do so.

In Oregon, as the aging sector works primarily at the individual level, the Cross Agency Systems Manager provides focus for the public health division and coordination with other statewide partners such as AARP and the Alzheimer’s Association on policy, systems and environmental change issues, such as tobacco policy, residential and in-home care settings, caregiving and worksite wellness policies, including paid sick leave and healthy meetings and events, agefriendly communities, and increasingly on dementia-friendly communities.

Conclusion

There are many ways for a public health department to become engaged in the promotion of the health and wellbeing of older adults. The current work in Oregon provides an innovative example particularly with the co-location of its Long-Term Care Program Analyst within its public health department. This approach enhances the state’s capacity to include healthy aging in its planning, data collection, communication, and program implementation. The Oregon model illustrates the potential for public health to effectively collaborate with the other sectors providing older adult services to promote optimal health.

Acknowledgements

TFAH wishes to acknowledge the contributions of Kirsten Aird, Cross Agency Systems Manager in Oregon’s Public Health Division, and Jennifer Mead, Program Analyst in the Oregon Department of Human Services State Unit on Aging, to make this case study possible. We are grateful for their expertise and commitment to ensure the effective collaboration between Oregon’s public health and aging services sectors.