State Category: Michigan
Alcohol and Drug Misuse and Suicide and the Millennial Generation – A Devastating Impact
Michigan
Racial Healing and Achieving Health Equity in the United States
Half of States Scored 5 or Lower Out of 10 Indicators in Report on Health Emergency Preparedness
Report Finds Funding to Support Base Level of Preparedness Cut More than Half Since 2002
Washington, D.C., December 19, 2017 – In Ready or Not? Protecting the Public’s Health from Diseases, Disasters and Bioterrorism, 25 states scored a 5 or lower on 10 key indicators of public health preparedness. Alaska scored lowest at 2 out of 10, and Massachusetts and Rhode Island scored the highest at 9 out of 10.
The report, issued today by the Trust for America’s Health (TFAH), found the country does not invest enough to maintain strong, basic core capabilities for health security readiness and, instead, is in a continued state of inefficiently reacting with federal emergency supplemental funding packages each time a disaster strikes.
According to Ready or Not?, federal funding to support the base level of preparedness has been cut by more than half since 2002, which has eroded advancements and reduced the country’s capabilities.
“While we’ve seen great public health preparedness advances, often at the state and community level, progress is continually stilted, halted and uneven,” said John Auerbach, president and CEO of TFAH. “As a nation, we—year after year—fail to fully support public health and preparedness. If we don’t improve our baseline funding and capabilities, we’ll continue to be caught completely off-guard when hurricanes, wildfires and infectious disease outbreaks hit.”
Ready or Not? features six expert commentaries from public health officials who share perspectives on and experiences from the historic hurricanes, wildfires and other events of 2017, including from California, Florida, Louisiana and Texas.
The report also examines the nation’s ability to respond to public health emergencies, tracks progress and vulnerabilities, and includes a review of state and federal public health preparedness policies. Some key findings include:
- Just 19 states and Washington, D.C. increased or maintained funding for public health from Fiscal Year (FY) 2015-2016 to FY 2016-2017.
- The primary source for state and local preparedness for health emergencies has been cut by about one-third (from $940 million in FY 2002 to $667 million in FY 2017) and hospital emergency preparedness funds have been cut in half ($514 million in FY 2003 to $254 million in FY 2017).
- In 20 states and Washington, D.C. 70 percent or more of hospitals reported meeting Antibiotic Stewardship Program core elements in 2016.
- Just 20 states vaccinated at least half of their population (ages 6 months and older) for the seasonal flu from Fall 2016 to Spring 2017—and no state was above 56 percent.
- 47 state labs and Washington, D.C. provided biosafety training and/or provided information about biosafety training courses (July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017).
The Ready or Not? report provides a series of recommendations that address many of the major gaps in emergency health preparedness, including:
- Communities should maintain a key set of foundational capabilities and focus on performance outcomes in exchange for increased flexibility and reduced bureaucracy.
- Ensuring stable, sufficient health emergency preparedness funding to maintain a standing set of core capabilities so they are ready when needed. In addition, a complementary Public Health Emergency Fund is needed to provide immediate surge funding for specific action for major emerging threats.
- Strengthening and maintaining consistent support for global health security as an effective strategy for preventing and controlling health crises. Germs know no borders.
- Innovating and modernizing infrastructure needs – including a more focused investment strategy to support science and technology upgrades that leverage recent breakthroughs and hold the promise of transforming the nation’s ability to promptly detect and contain disease outbreaks and respond to other health emergencies.
- Recruiting and training a next generation public health workforce with expert scientific abilities to harness and use technological advances along with critical thinking and management skills to serve as Chief Health Strategist for a community.
- Reconsidering health system preparedness for new threats and mass outbreaks. Develop stronger coalitions and partnerships among providers, hospitals and healthcare facilities, insurance providers, pharmaceutical and health equipment businesses, emergency management and public health agencies.
- Preventing the negative health consequences of climate change and weather-related threats. It is essential to build the capacity to anticipate, plan for and respond to climate-related events.
- Prioritizing efforts to address one of the most serious threats to human health by expanding efforts to stop superbugs and antibiotic resistance.
- Improving rates of vaccinations for children and adults – which are one of the most effective public health tools against many infectious diseases.
- Supporting a culture of resilience so all communities are better prepared to cope with and recover from emergencies, particularly focusing on those who are most vulnerable. Sometimes the aftermath of an emergency situation may be more harmful than the initial event. This must also include support for local organizations and small businesses to prepare for and to respond to emergencies.
The report was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF).
Score Summary:
A full list of all of the indicators and scores and the full report are available on TFAH’s website. For the state-by-state scoring, states received one point for achieving an indicator or zero points if they did not achieve the indicator. Zero is the lowest possible overall score, 10 is the highest. The data for the indicators are from publicly available sources or were provided from public officials.
9 out of 10: Massachusetts and Rhode Island
8 out of 10: Delaware, North Carolina and Virginia
7 out of 10: Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, New York, Oregon and Washington
6 out of 10: California, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont and West Virginia
5 out of 10: Georgia, Idaho, Maine, Mississippi, Montana and Tennessee
4 out of 10: Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania
3 out of 10: Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming
2 out of 10: Alaska
Trust for America’s Health is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to saving lives by protecting the health of every community and working to make disease prevention a national priority.
###
Lansing’s Efforts to Prevent and Respond to Childhood Lead Exposure
“We started asking about lead, and what is the safe level of lead, and there isn’t one, especially for kids. So we said the prudent thing to do is to improve the testing and start getting these lead pipes out. Get the lead out.”
Background
In 2004, then-Michigan State Senator Virg Bernero encouraged local officials to work with Lansing Board of Water and Light (BWL) Commissioners to speed up the removal of lead service lines (LSLs). The BWL, a municipally-owned utility, funded the program as an infrastructure investment, and utility customers shared the cost through an increase in their water rates. BWL gave priority to lines serving schools and licensed day care facilities, areas where children had elevated blood lead levels, households with pregnant women or children under age 6, and other places with high concentrations of LSLs.
From 2004 to 2016, Lansing, Michigan, replaced 12,150 LSLs with copper lines, becoming only the second city in the country to remove all its active lead service lines. The total cost was $44.5 million.
Lead Service Line Replacement
BWL has developed a faster, more efficient way to replace pipes; what had been a nearly 8-hour job, $9,000 job requiring a trench to be dug from the main in the street to the foundation of the house, has been streamlined to 4 hours at a cost of $3,600. Instead of trenching, BWL now digs a hole in the street and another where the shut-off valve is, pulls the old pipe out from underground and slides in the new one.
Additionally, where possible, the lead service line replacement program has followed planned street, sewer, and other infrastructure improvement projects to minimize street closures and reduce the cost of street reconstruction.
Service line replacements were scheduled to prioritize replacing any lead service lines serving schools and licensed day care centers, areas having children with elevated blood lead levels, households with pregnant women or children under age six, and other areas with large concentrations of lead service lines.
The lead service line replacement program engages customers through outreach (distribution of brochures and articles in bills, open houses at schools and community centers, and information inserted in routine water quality reports).
BWL water quality reports indicate a decrease in lead levels in the water over 10 years, from 2005 to 2015, with 90 percent of homes at or below 7.8 parts per billion in 2015 (down from 11.3 parts per billion in 2005). Although the BWL completed its lead service line replacement program, it will continue its corrosion control process.
_______________________________________________
In August, 2017, the Health Impact Project, a collaboration between the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) and Pew Charitable Trusts released: Ten Policies to Prevent and Respond to Childhood Lead Exposure. The Trust for America’s Health (TFAH), National Center for Healthy Housing (NCHH), Urban Institute, Altarum Institute, Child Trends and many researchers and partners contributed to the report. TFAH and NCHH worked with Pew, RWJF and local advocates and officials to put together the above case study about lead poisoning and prevention initiatives.
The case study does not attempt to capture everything a location is doing on lead, but aims to highlight some of the important work.
How Embedding Health Access and Nurses in Schools Improves Health in Grand Rapids, Michigan
For more than 20 years, Grand Rapids Public Schools (GRPS) has partnered with Spectrum Health to improve educational and health outcomes for their students through Spectrum’s School Health Program. Started in 1995, the School Health Program will be expanded to its 14th additional school districts in 2017.
The GRPS Model
The GRPS program utilizes school health teams comprised of registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), and health aides to provide direct services to students in 48 schools. GRPS’ branch of the School Health Program currently employs 34 RNs, 11 LPNs, and 34 health aides and operates four full-service school-based health centers.
In the GRPS model, school teams operate under the supervision of a school nurse whose primary responsibility is oversight of health care delivery to students during the school day. The district has established policies and procedures to describe how care is to be delivered by the team under the supervision of the Registered Nurse. The nurse may delegate care to other school staff.
School nurse responsibilities include: identification of students who have health conditions; developing a plan for care during the school day; training and oversight of staff for safe delivery of medications and treatments; providing services that cannot be delegated; establishing medical response teams to respond to emergencies; telephone triage and support; surveillance and reporting of communicable diseases; connecting students to medical, dental, and mental health care through referrals; promoting health; health education; health screenings and follow up; and assisting students in obtaining immunizations.
GRPS uses funds from a variety of sources to support their school nurses including:
- the district budget;
- their local intermediate school district;
- the State Department of Education—including grants and 31A funds (for students deemed at high risk); and
- Spectrum Health.
The full-time equivalent (FTE) for the nurses for each school is adjusted based on the health needs of the student population and the availability of funds. Even though some funding for school nurses is still provided through Title I, GRPS has largely moved to alternative funding streams due to cumbersome reporting requirements.
While RNs serve as the cornerstones in the model, GRPS also braids together funding streams from both public and private entities to allow for reimbursement and service provision under a variety of health delivery models beyond the traditional school nurse reimbursement model. Coordinating funds and services across the spectrum of health providers and sources enables GRPS to provide services outside of the traditional school nurse model—such as dental services.
GRPS has also partnered with Cherry Health Services a local Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) to deliver health services in their school-based health centers and through a traveling dental program. Because these services are provided through an FQHC, they are eligible for Medicaid reimbursement and receive the FQHC enhanced reimbursement rate.
While data systems and privacy concerns have hindered data sharing and integration in the past, GRPS is actively moving towards linking education and health data under one system. The new data system is built upon the district’s student record system and has the potential to more easily link school health metrics to attendance and academic data. These system improvements are crucial steps to helping Spectrum Health and GRPS track and accomplish both its short-term goals to improve attendance and reduce chronic absenteeism and its long-term goals to improve graduation rates, workplace readiness and college entry.
Consultative RN Hub Model
In more rural districts, Spectrum Health has developed a consultative RN hub model for service delivery. Nurses are able to serve students utilizing telemedicine through its MedNow program—reducing travel time for school nurses and costs for the district. The Regional program will serve 13 districts in 2017 with 14 RN and two LPN.
Results
The partnership between Spectrum Health and the school districts have produced significant improvements in important school health indicators. Key accomplishments from FY 2015 included:
- 97 percent of students at participating schools met current immunization requirements to attend school;
- 98 percent of problems identified were resolved on-site by the school health care team;
- 195,092 visits occurred to the school health office; and
- 28,864 students were served across 7 school districts.
For more information, please visit http://www.spectrumhealth.org/healthier-communities/our-programs/school-health-program
It Takes a Village: How Mancelona, Michigan Worked Together to Improve Health and Education
By Mike Swain, MPH, Community Health Coordinator, Health Department of Northwest Michigan
In the early 1990s, residents of Mancelona (a northern Michigan town) had limited access to healthcare, social services and higher education and there were sparse employment opportunities.
With the lowest per capita income in the immediate area, most families lived in poverty, and were underinsured, uninsured altogether or enrolled in Medicaid.
Some of the community’s youngest were hardest hit: the area had the state’s highest rates of youth physical and sexual abuse, teen pregnancies, drinking and drug use. And as could be expected, these health risks had a significant impact on academic performance – with behavior problems in the classroom, low grades, and high dropout rates. In the 1994-95 school year, 39 percent of Mancelona high schoolers dropped out and just 64 percent of the senior class graduated.
Terry McCleod, the Middle School Principal at the time, recognized the critical role of student health and wellness in academic success – and he led the charge for change in Mancelona.
First, he brought together a grassroots network of public and private service providers. Along with a three year grant from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, they built Project S.H.A.R.E. (School Home Alliance for Restructured Education) to provide a comprehensive assessment and evaluation of the gaps and needs in Mancelona.
The results made it clear that any successful, lasting intervention would need to improve the environment and families by addressing the underlying, interconnected issues of poverty. The layout of the community’s schools—all three were essentially on the same campus—allowed for a unique solution: building a dedicated family resource center right next to school grounds. With thoughtful outreach, community advocates and the public health administration were engaged in the cause, and the land for this building was secured.
The group secured a grant from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) to fund the beginning of construction, with the Mancelona Family Resource Center (MFRC) officially opening in 1996.
MFRC housed health, social, daycare, educational, and economic services, offering a unique and comprehensive suite of services to support Mancelona’s students and their families. Staffing and programs were brought in with continued support from Project S.H.A.R.E., including the Michigan Works! Association – which resided in a dedicated wing of the MFRC.
Michigan Works! played a critical role in turning the tide of poverty by strengthening the employability of adults with workforce development services and mobilization of local businesses.
Still, quality healthcare was at the heart, with the local Health Department providing previously unattainable care, including a Dental Health Clinic, on site. Additionally, the MFRC team provided convenient and confidential, family planning, reproductive health services, and education. And working closely with the school, this innovative approach included the development of a dedicated class for pregnant mothers to help improve the health of future Mancelona generations.
Over time, partnerships and additional resources were added within the center, the school and the community. In 2001, Communities In Schools (CIS) began providing programs and services in Mancelona. Founded on the national CIS model, this non-profit organization provided new programs for before/after school activities, mentoring and tutoring.
The CIS team worked in collaboration with the MFRC, providing care coordination and referrals for students and their families. And, when the state of Michigan expanded school-linked health center qualification requirements to include areas with rural status, the MFRC leadership were among the first applicants in line. Mancelona was included with the first round of funded centers under this new qualification.
In 2006, with this additional funding, the Mancelona school-linked health center opened, called the Ironmen Health Center, was opened. The Center offered services to students aged 10-21 regardless of health insurance status. In addition, social work and behavioral health services were provided.
By blending and braiding different funding sources and bringing to bear all community resources to link families to important social services and interventions, the community is much improved.
In fact, rates of teen pregnancy, drug and tobacco use, and child abuse are all down. And, high school graduation is up—to 91 percent, a 42 percent increase from the inception of project.
The benefits of this innovative care model doesn’t stop there: 60 percent of the 2013 graduating class enrolled in college that fall. And nearly 100 percent of the 2015 seniors are making plans to pursue some form of higher education or technical skills training post-graduation. What was once and ending is now just the beginning of a story.
Here you can find a timeline and more information on the model, including details on the Women’s Resource Center, Communities in Schools and the Ironmen Health Center.
How an Entire Community Can Come Together to Help Control Asthma
By Karen Meyerson, MSN, APRN, NP-C, AE-C, Manager, Asthma Network of West Michigan
In 1994, a group of concerned health professionals in West Michigan recognized the alarming rise in pediatric asthma morbidity and mortality, locally as well as nationally. Significant disparities are also associated with asthma. For example, asthma deaths in Michigan occur six times more frequently in Black children than in White children. In response, the Asthma Network of West Michigan (ANWM) was formed as a grass-roots coalition with initial funding from the (then) three acute care hospitals and two local foundations.
To reach and improve the lives of the nearly 100,000 people in Western Michigan—24 percent of whom are children—who have asthma, ANWM created a direct service arm of its coalition and implemented a home-based asthma case management program for school-aged children who had uncontrolled asthma. ANWM, believed to be the first grassroots asthma coalition in the nation to receive reimbursement for asthma education and case management services from health insurance plans, has since expanded its services to adults as well as children under the age of 5.
Our model relies on a few core components: home visits, care conferences and school/daycare visits and social worker services.
Home Visits
Research and common sense says that the environment around a child, particularly the home, is an important factor in preventing and controlling asthma. Consequently, a home visit provides the ideal setting to educate, review medication plans, and help families identify environmental factors that may contribute to the severity of asthma. If there are issues in the home that are triggering asthma attacks, we connect the family to our partner, the Healthy Homes Coalition, that provides environmental remediation.
To help educate families, we send a certified asthma educator—a nurse (at the RN level) or respiratory therapist (at the RRT level)—into the homes of patients for up to a year to perform environmental assessments and teach them about asthma attack trigger identification and avoidance/reduction, medications, proper use of devices and other self-management techniques. The asthma educator’s home visits are typically biweekly for the first three months and then monthly thereafter, as necessary, to provide a continuum of care.
Care Conferences and School/Daycare Visits
Care conferences—which are reimbursable visits—are held with the primary care physician and, if indicated, the asthma specialist soon after a new patient enters the program. These conferences tackle issues surrounding adherence, including psychosocial barriers to asthma management and access to care, and elicit a written asthma action plan, if none exists. If necessary, we provide spacers, a device to use with inhalers, to all patients who do not have them.
School/daycare visits – also reimbursable visits – are conducted in order to educate those caring for the children throughout the day about asthma and the child’s asthma in particular. We share the asthma action plan with staff and discuss asthma triggers in those settings.
Social Work Services
Lastly, we connect patients to our Licensed Masters-level Social Worker’s services (LMSW), which help families link the clinical recommendations they receive in the hospital or at the doctor’s office with the social services in their community. This is a vital service because many of our patients and families typically have multiple stressors, ranging from environmental to financial to socio-legal and LMSWs are uniquely capable of identifying and assisting with this range of problems. By blending social support with clinical support, ANWM makes the appropriate referrals or contacts to financial resources, mental health agencies, food banks, hospitals, landlords and others.
Successes
With this type of intensive, personal care, we have had demonstrated success in controlling asthma and reducing healthcare utilization (including emergency department visits and hospital admissions due to asthma). Patients often “graduate” from our program after just 6 to 12 months when their asthma control has improved.
When reviewing data over the past 19 years, we find that there have been significant reductions (64 percent) in the number of hospitalizations, days hospitalized for children and emergency department visits (from 60 percent to 35 percent). And, for low-income children with moderate to severe asthma who remained in the original case management study for at least 1 year, we saw an estimated average savings of $1,625 in hospital charges per patient. In total, we estimate the program results in approximately $800 in net healthcare savings per child per year, with a return to society—over two years—of $1.53 for every $1 invested.
We also hear from those we serve. The mother of a 5-year old boy with asthma told us that, “working with the Asthma Network has really made a big difference – his asthma is controlled now. They gave me education and made sure that I understood what asthma meant…they made me feel like no one was judging me.” Mom added, “I thought he had asthma ONLY when he got sick so I didn’t give him his inhaler until he had symptoms. If I had never had that education, who knows how many more asthma attacks or emergency room visits he would have?”
Another important, but perhaps overlooked success, is merely being paid for our services by health insurance plans. Most similar programs aren’t so lucky to receive reimbursement for their hard work. We get reimbursed by Medicaid managed care plans, Medicare and other commercial insurers. We have also been successful in raising grant funds and community benefit funds from local hospitals. It takes a lot of different funding streams, braided and blended together, to support our program, even with the insurance reimbursement. The funding is out there, you just need to spend the time to find it and combine the various streams to succeed.
ANWM owes our success to intentional collaborations with local health insurance plans, hospitals and schools, the people and entities helping patients (public health nurses, physician practices, community clinics, and our local healthcare HUB, Health Net of West Michigan) and our unique ability to blend different funding sources
Because of our success, other Michigan coalitions have formed and begun replicating our model—and they have also been successful in securing payment for similar services in their respective communities.
For more than 20 years we’ve worked hard to prevent adverse asthma events among our most vulnerable populations. We wouldn’t have been successful without the network of community resources and funding we’ve been able to marshal – and the ability, through home visits and social work services, to connect families to those services. Asthma cannot be cured, but it can be controlled. Individuals with asthma should expect nothing less.
Come to the Table
ohiSince 2009, ProMedica’s, “Come to the Table” program has been working to ensure the well-being of communities in northwest Ohio and southeast Michigan by creating services and programs addressing basic nutritional needs. The link between hunger and poor health is clear—adults living in food insecure homes have chronic diseases and behavioral health conditions. Food-insecure children suffer an even greater impact with delayed development and poorer quality of life. Health threats resulting from hunger are preventable and ProMedica continues to develop and implement strategies to feed communities including: operating a food reclamation program to repackage un-served food and distribute to homeless shelters; developing a food security screening program to identify hospital patients who are food insecure to ensure they have food and access to resources upon being discharged from the hospital; and the future opening of the Ebeid Institute for Population Health in Toledo, Ohio, which will have a fresh food market and offer job training and health services. ProMedica’s strong community partnerships at the local, state, and federal levels are central to developing these collaborative opportunities. To read more about this innovative program, see this brief summary [link].