Healthy People 2030

(Washington, D.C. – September 30, 2020)

On August 18, 2020, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released Healthy People 2030 – the 5th iteration of the nation’s 10-year plan that sets data-driven objectives and targets to improve health and well-being in the United States. Updated every decennial since 1980, Healthy People 2030 builds on the knowledge gained and lessons learned to address the nation’s most critical public health priorities and challenges.

Healthy People 2030 includes 355 objectives in alignment with five overreaching goals. These goals include:

  • Attain healthy, thriving lives and well-being free of preventable disease, disability, injury, and premature death.
  • Eliminate health disparities, achieve health equity, and attain health literacy to improve the health and well-being of all.
  • Create social, physical, and economic environments that promote attaining the full potential for health and well-being for all.
  • Promote healthy development, healthy behaviors, and well-being across all life stages.
  • Engage leadership, key constituents, and the public across multiple sectors to take action and design policies that improve the health and well-being of all.

Healthy People 2030 also includes prioritizing 10-year measurable targets for objectives related to the social determinants of health – which include economic stability, education, health care access, neighborhoods and the built environment, and social and community environments. For example, related to economic stability and food insecurity, HHS wants to reduce household food insecurity by 5 percent over the next 10 years (11.1 percent of households were food insecure in 2018).

“Healthy People 2030 aligns with many of Trust for America’s Health’s priorities around health conditions such as diabetes and obesity; health behaviors such as vaccination and drug and alcohol use; population-level health for groups such as older adults; systems such as public health infrastructure and preparedness for emerging public health threats like COVID-19; and the social determinants of health,” said John Auerbach, President, and CEO at Trust for America’s Health.

“It provides a framework of measurable objectives to evaluate the change that needs to occur to achieve optimal health and well-being for every person and community. COVID-19 is the most current example that demonstrates the longstanding disproportionate health and economic impacts faced by Black, Indigenous, and people of color along with other marginalized communities. Together, public health must work with multiple sectors to advance equitable policies that address these social and economic disparities, and work towards achieving the goals of Healthy People 2030.”

For more information, visit Healthy People 2030.

Let’s Go

“Let’s Go! uses evidence-based strategies to promote policies and environmental changes that make it easier for people to live healthy, active lives. We track strategy implementation through annual surveys with our participating sites and monitor obesity rates and behavior data through the Maine Integrated Youth Health Survey (MIYHS), a state survey given to school children every other year. In addition, we monitor the awareness and knowledge of the program through an annual family member survey.

The Let’s Go! multi-setting model engages schools, out-of-school programs, early care, and education programs, and health care practices to reach families where they live, learn, work, and play to reinforce the importance of healthy living. The program is based on the premise that if children and families are exposed to the same health message in multiple places across their community, and if those places have policies and environments that support healthy choices, children and families will be more likely to adopt or maintain the behaviors in their daily lives.”

Impact of the program:

  • In 2019, the programs reached nearly 240,00 children and youth and over 17,000 adults
  • 2019 annual survey showed that 770 schools, early care, and education programs, and out-of-school programs limited sugary drinks and 783 provided opportunities for physical activity daily; 690 sites limited unhealthy choices for snacks and celebrations; 680 limited recreational screen time; and 690 prohibited using food as a reward.                        

Website https://mainehealth.org/lets-go/impact

Pathways to a Healthy Kansas

Pathways to a Healthy Kansas is the largest community grant program funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield Kansas. The Pathways program was established in order to provide community coalitions the resources they need to remove barriers to health and engage communities to live a healthier lifestyle. Grant recipients are required to engage in a cross-sector collaboration in order to address the program’s seven focus areas in order to create sustainable change in communities. The seven areas are community policy, community well-being, food retail, health care, restaurants, schools, and worksites. The focus areas aim to promote active living, healthy eating, and tobacco prevention.

Application booklet (provides more info on the program): https://communityengagementinstitute.org/Documents/Pathways_Application_Booklet_0516.pdf

Main website: https://www.bcbsks.com/AboutUs/blue-health-initiatives/pathways.shtml

Nemours Florida Prevention Initiative

“Since 2009, Nemours FPI has been investing in disease prevention and health promotion in central Florida in an effort to address childhood obesity and promote healthy, early childhood development. Focusing on children’s first five years of life is based on the recognition that habits are still forming in the early years, early learning gives value on acquired skills, and early prevention beats the cost of later remediation. Nemours FPI has provided training and resources to central Florida child care programs including distribution of the Healthy Habits for Life Child Care Resource Kit – developed in partnership with Sesame Workshop, Nemours Health & Prevention Service and KidsHealth. Since then, working in partnership with Head Starts, Early Learning Coalitions, the University of Florida/IFAS Extension Offices, and other higher learning institutes, Nemours FPI has used a train-the-trainer model to provide healthy eating and physical activity training to child care providers, including family child care homes. Over time, FPI’s prevention and population health interventions have focused on communities in need to provide direct training and technical assistance” Nemours Florida Prevention Initiative.pdf

Main website: https://www.nemours.org/services/health/growuphealthy/about.html

 

Arkansas Children’s Hospital Food Security Program

“The mission of the Access to Healthy Foods Research Group is to build evidence, capacity, and support for an equitable food system that fosters the health and wellness of children, families, and communities in Arkansas. The work of the ATHF Research Group focuses on the development, delivery, and evaluation of individual and environmental-level interventions such as farm to school, school and community gardens, and support for increased local and healthy food production, distribution, and consumption.”

Website: https://www.archildrens.org/research/research-programs-and-centers/access-to-healthy-foods

The Community Health Program

The Community Health Program (CHAP) was founded in the 1960s to provide health care access to rural communities. CHAP is a network comprised of approximately 550 Community Health Aides/Practitioners (CHA/P)in more than 170 rural Alaska villages.

To become a CHA, members from the communities are trained in Anchorage, Bethel, Nome, and Fairbanks where they undergo an intensive program that includes classroom instruction, hands-on training, and clinical practice. The program gives the aides the skills to provide a number of services such as eye exams, responding to emergencies and diagnosing ear infection. After the program, aides go back to work in their communities to start seeing patients. The aids work closely with medical professionals in their regional hospitals. Website: http://www.akchap.org/html/about-chap.html

In-depth article: https://crosscut.com/sponsored/creative-approach-rural-community-health-care

Addressing the Crisis of Black Youth Suicide: Interview with Dr. Michael A. Lindsey

Dr. Lindsey is the executive director of the McSilver Institute for Poverty Policy and Research at New York University. He also leads the working group of experts supporting the Congressional Black Caucus Emergency Task Force on Black Youth Suicide and Mental Health. The Task Force report, Ring the Alarm: The Crisis of Black Youth Suicide, released in December 2019, is a comprehensive examination of the alarming rise in suicide rates for Black youth over the past generation; a survey of available data and evidence; and a call for policymakers and communities to take action to better understand and to reverse this emergent trend.[1]

 

TFAH: Please describe your work at the McSilver Institute.

Dr. Lindsey: We focus on the social determinants of mental health, as well as trauma and treatment disparities, all of which intersect with intergenerational poverty. If you are experiencing inequality related to, for example, food insecurity or underemployment, that has a psychological impact. We are looking for ways to break that cycle. We are committed to studying intergenerational poverty, not only to understand its consequences, but to also do something about it.


TFAH:
Where does your passion for your work come from?

Dr. Lindsey:
I’ve always been interested in mental health treatment disparities, particularly the lack of treatment access for serious mental health issues among Black people. I know the consequences of lack of mental health treatment. My passion derives from growing up in the Southeast section of Washington, D.C., where I saw the effects of drug use and undiagnosed, untreated addiction and mental health issues. I want to bridge that gap to make sure kids and families are connected to treatment in meaningful ways.


TFAH:
If you could recommend to policymakers one or two actions that would make a real difference on the social determinants of mental health, what would they be?

Dr. Lindsey: Let’s focus that a bit. And that’s a key point. Whatever we design as an intervention has to speak to the unique issues that are experienced by a specific group. For example, looking at the rising rates of suicide among Black youth. We need to have mental health professionals in schools, proportionate to the number of kids in that school. We can’t have one provider trying to serve 500 kids or even 100 kids; that’s too many. We also need to see more federal research dollars, specifically, for studying the increasing rate of Black youth suicide. The data are clearly telling us that Black youth are at high risk.


TFAH:
Does the research you are calling for need to be population-focused?

Dr. Lindsey: No question, it does. The research also needs to be gender-sensitive and culturally appropriate. We need to understand how families of color, in this case, Black families, resolve mental health challenges. For example, do we need to involve clergy in the intervention programs? Do we need services in non-traditional settings? Do we need to provide services in places other than those that the community believes are where “crazy people” go? Setting up services from the consumer perspective will help us establish services that are going to be meaningful.

TFAH: What’s the impact of the school environment on the lives of Black children? Are you concerned about school disciplinary policies that have unintended consequences for students who end up in trouble with the juvenile justice system?

Dr. Lindsey: This is something I’m particularly concerned about. For students of color, there’s implicit bias in how their behaviors are interpreted. If you have a White kid and a Black kid and a Latino kid—if the Black or Latino kid aggresses toward someone, the reaction is that kid is a bad kid, one who should be removed from school. But if a White kid acts up, he is perceived as having emotional challenges. The White kid is not suspended, he’s offered mental health services. It happens a lot.

When Black kids are suspended from school, they can be wayward in the community, they’re not engaged, their behavior comes to the attention of law enforcement—it’s a vicious cycle. It’s also tough for those same kids who are suspended from school to return to school because those school communities often don’t want them back. The largest number of students who have this lack of school engagement tend to be Black and Brown.

If we had intervened on those behaviors early on and gotten those kids to mental health treatment and associated services, we could have averted that later suspension from school. It’s a matter of how we interpret the behavioral presentations of kids. It happens to be that Black and Brown students are the ones who are not getting the requisite services surrounding their mental health.


TFAH:
What has been the impact of zero-tolerance policies in schools on students of color?

Dr. Lindsey:
Zero-tolerance has had a big impact on what I would call school persistence and staying connected to school among Black and Brown kids. Zero-tolerance policies do not work, and they disadvantage low-income kids and kids of color.


TFAH:
McSilver’s Step Up program is established in two New York City high schools. Can you tell us more about it?

Dr. Lindsey:
Step Up is focused on positive youth development. What we do is take students who are at risk for truancy or school dropout, and we wrap-around services to support them. It includes peer support—so a lot of peer-based mentoring—as well as professionally led activities to help kids stay on a positive course. The program has an 85 percent graduation rate; that’s about 10 percent higher than the general graduation rate in New York City. Programs like Step Up or school mental health services that can be offered to kids who are struggling can be very important to ensure that these kids stay connected.

TFAH: You led the expert working group that helped inform the work of the Congressional Black Caucus Emergency Task Force on Black Youth Suicide and Mental Health. What did the task force find and what did it recommend?

Dr. Lindsey: Black youth suicide and suicidal behaviors are rising. Black boys (ages 5 to 12 years old) are twice as likely to die by suicide as compared with their White peers. We led a study at the McSilver Institute that found that the self-reported suicide attempt rate for Black youth increased by 73 percent between 1991 and 2017; meanwhile, self-reported suicide attempt rates fell for White and Latino kids and for Asian and American Indian/Alaska Native kids during the same period.

What needs to be done is many of things we’ve talked about. We’re calling for mental health professionals in every school and for more National Institutes of Health funding. We’re calling for Mental Health First Aid to be widely implemented in schools. All the professionals in schools should be well-versed in the presentation of mental health issues, the signs that a student may be having trouble and how to get that student connected to supportive treatment.

We are also calling for more demonstration projects, programs that would implement evidence-based and best practices for clinicians and teachers and anyone who interacts with Black youth. We are calling for investment in demonstration projects to identify exemplars and then implement those programs at scale.


TFAH:
What is required to scale up promising programs?

Dr. Lindsey: We have a program called Making Connections. In this program, we are targeting kids who have depression. The program works to reduce stigma. It is designed to help families understand what mental health treatment is all about and to address any concerns they might have about it. It’s a promising program I’d like to see delivered at scale. In order to do that, we are going to have to invest dollars in understanding how this program works. We are currently funded by NIMH [National Institute of Mental Health], but we are going to need increased funding to be able to do this in other places. If we are going to deliver these programs at scale, we are going to have to engage in the research to take them to scale. That means establishing the efficacy of programs like Making Connections, but also determining how best to implement programs like it at scale.


TFAH:
Anything else you want to share?

Dr. Lindsey:
I’m reminded of the power of storytelling. We need to demonstrate how implicit bias is impacting Black and Brown kids, bias that is potentially an underlying feature of why we are seeing the rising suicide trends. We need to tell the story of implicit bias in compelling ways. I believe that will challenge folks to action. It’s also important to recognize the role that stigma and mistrust play in the disconnection from services. They play a huge role in terms of the disconnection from mental health treatment. We need to work on bridging those gaps between need and use of treatment.

[1] Watson Coleman B. Ring the Alarm: The Crisis of Black Youth Suicide in America. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Black Caucus Emergency TaskForce on Black Youth Suicide and Mental Health, December 2019. https://watsoncoleman.house.gov/uploadedfiles/full_taskforce_report.pdf (accessed April 30, 2020).

 

New TFAH Web-based Tool Will Help Policymakers Better Understand Their Constituent’s Health Status

(Washington, DC – May, ) Trust for America’s Health has created a new web-based tool that will allow members of Congress, their staff and grassroots health advocates to identify the health needs of constituents and target programs and resources where they are most needed.

The new web tool, How Healthy is your Congressional District? created by TFAH with data provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is a one-year snapshot of health measures for every congressional district in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. These data were reported within the CDC’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) for 2017.

Data, reported nationally, by state and by Congressional district, as part of this website are:

  1. Percentage of adults who lack health insurance
  2. Current percentage of adults who smoke
  3. Cholesterol screening within the previous five years among adults
  4. Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults
  5. Percentage of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes
  6. Percentage of adults who report their general health as fair or poor
  7. Percentage of adults who report they could not see a doctor due to cost
  8. Percentage of adults who have obesity
  9. Percentage of adults who report they have no leisure-time physical activity
  10. Percentage of adults who received a flu shot or flu vaccine during the past 12 months

Ten of the eleven indicators are measures of adults aged 18 years and older; the health insurance measure (#1) is of adults 18-64.

Data should drive policymaking. Toward that goal, TFAH is providing this data reporting tool to policymakers, community leaders, health promotion advocates, and other interested parties. The webpage provides data to policymakers and others who want to know more about the health of their congressional districts.

“Making these comparative data easily available to policymakers will help identify critical action steps and policies that if made will improve the health status of many Americans,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health. “These data also help identify those districts that are in the greatest need of health-promoting policy interventions”.

Why Analyze by Congressional District?

The webpage is a unique source of information on these select 11 indicators reported by the congressional district. Other existing data sources are most often available at the state or county levels. This lack of data reported at the congressional district level can make it challenging for elected officials, their staff, and local residents and organizations, to gain an accurate picture of the health concerns specific to a district.

There are health-related concerns in every district. The elevated health risk in certain districts is likely a reflection of the social, economic, and environmental conditions related to their demographic composition. These data will assist all of the residents of a district – including the elected officials – to understand what needs to be done to promote optimal health and wellbeing at the local level.

In addition, the constituents of a district may find the information useful in prioritizing their community-level efforts, when seeking resources from private and public organizations, or when tracking trends over time and when conferring with local leaders about issues of concern.

 

New PHACCS Resources

State policymakers often focus on improving residents’ health by expanding and ensuring access to quality health services. While the healthcare sector has a critical role in improving health outcomes, studies show that only 10 to 20 percent of health is determined by medical care. The circumstances in our everyday lives shape our health whether it’s where we live, how we eat, where we go to school, our workplaces, who we care for, or what opportunities we have (or don’t have) to succeed, it all has a profound effect on long-term health—regardless of what type of healthcare we receive. TFAH has developed policy briefs and resources that consider the root causes of that negatively impact public health and suggests policies that support multisector solutions, beyond the healthcare sector, to improve the nation’s health, community by community. Learn more about our work in PHACCS.

 

PHACCS Report 

PHACCS Resources

 

 

 

 

The State of Obesity 2019 Congressional Briefing: Better Policies for a Healthier America

On November 18th, 2019, Trust for America’s Health held a briefing for congressional staff and partners that reviewed the latest obesity rates and trends, the role of public health and other stakeholders in preventing, treating and responding to obesity and its comorbidities, highlighted promising approaches to ensure healthy communities, and offered evidence-based policy recommendations that could help all Americans lead healthier lives.

Briefing speakers included:

  • John Auerbach, MBA, President and CEO, Trust for America’s Health
  • Devita Davison, Executive Director, FoodLab Detroit
  • Martha Halko, MS, RD, LD, Deputy Director of Prevention & Wellness, Cuyahoga County (Ohio) Board of Health
  • Ruth Petersen, MD, MPH, Director, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)

Briefing materials:

  • Panelists biographies
  • Presentation slides
  • CDC Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity At A Glance fact sheet
  • CDC Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity’s Work in Healthcare Settings to Reduce Childhood Obesity fact sheet
  • TFAH’s State of Obesity 2019 Report
  • TFAH’s State of Obesity 2019 report fact sheet
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s (RWJF) 2019 Obesity Report

For more information, please contact Daphne Delgado, TFAH Senior Government Relations Manager at [email protected]